In a 2-1 decision, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling dismissing a case from R.M.A., a female minor who identifies as a transgender boy, “which alleged discrimination in public accommodation, specifically, the boys’ locker rooms and restrooms, based on sex.”
This decision affirms a lower court’s ruling dismissing the case on grounds that “the Missouri Human Rights Act does not extend its protection to claims based on gender identity.” According to the opinion, “Our judicial role does not permit us to vary settled legislative intent based on evolving social sensitivities. Instead, we are bound by the state of the law as it currently exists.”
Missouri appeals court: State’s Human Rights Act does not cover gender identity — kcur.org
R.M.A. (a minor child), by His Next Friend: Rachelle Appleberry vs. Blue Springs R-IV School District, et al — July 18 2017
Drew Adams is a 16-year-old student at Nease High School in St Johns County, FL who identifies as a transgender boy. Lambda Legal recently filed a lawsuit on Adams’ behalf seeking access to the boys’ restrooms at the high school Adams attends.
According to Adams, “I started using the boys’ room during my freshman year, when I began living as the boy that I am, and everything was fine. No one bothered me and I didn’t bother anyone else. But then one day, I was pulled out of class and told that I could no longer use the boys’ room, and would have to use one of the few gender-neutral bathrooms on campus instead. Apparently, someone had anonymously reported me, as if I was doing something wrong. I wasn’t.”
Adams’ attorneys assert “that St. John County School Board’s discriminatory restroom policy sends a purposeful message that transgender students in the school district are undeserving of the privacy, respect and protections afforded to other students. Lambda Legal also argues that the school district’s policy to exclude transgender students from the restrooms that match their gender is unconstitutional because it discriminates based on sex in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendments Act.”
Adams v. The School Board of St. Johns County, Florida — Lambda Legal
My High School Won’t Let Me Use the Bathroom, so I’m Suing It — Lambda Legal
Complaint — filed June 28, 2017
On June 6, 2017 the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) issued an internal memo to OCR attorneys, explaining “the effects on the developments on the enforcement of Title IX by the Office for Civil Rights.” The letter emphasizes that “OCR may not rely on the policy set forth in the May 2016 DCL or the January 7, 2015 letter to a private individual as the sole basis for resolving a complaint. …Rather, OCR should rely on Title IX and its implementing regulations, as interpreted in decisions of federal courts and OCR guidance documents that remain in effect, in evaluating complaints of sex discrimination of individuals whether or not the individual is transgender.” The letter also encourages attorneys to “evaluated each allegation separately” and briefly outlines the procedure for dismissing a complaint.
Trump administration’s guidance to Office for Civil Rights on transgender student complaints — Washington Post
Jessiqua Kat Valentine is a male who identifies as a woman. In 2013, when he was 16, he faced opposition from girls at Florence High School in Florence, Colorado, when he sought access to girls’ facilities, as the girls complained that they did not want a male in their private space.
Transgender activists railed against this blog and other pro-women activists who publicized this case, saying that Valentine should not be “outed.”
Valentine, of course, famously appeared in a local news report about the case (i.e., outed himself), and also publicized the case on his own Facebook page, as the screenshot from 2013 shows above (original can be viewed here).
Valentine appears to have started the chemical castration process in March 2017, according to his Instagram account. He also has a YouTube channel featuring him playing the accordion and talking, sounding like the male he is. Some of his videos have in excess of 45,000 views. His Twitter dates from 2012 and includes lots of happy high school tweets like this:
News Account of Valentine discussing his bathroom battle: Statute change and lawsuit shape gender identity policy in Color – KOAA
The American Civil Liberties Union continues to demonstrate that it does not care about the rights of children in taking up the cause of a teenage girl in Michigan who wants access to boys’ facilities because she says she’s a boy. It sent a letter to the Jenison High School superintendent on behalf of the girl, who apparently is offended that she was told that she could choose between the bathroom corresponding with her actual sex , one of three unisex staff bathrooms or a so-called gender-neutral bathroom installed.
Letter to Superintendent TenBrink
Michigan school’s bathroom policy stigmatizes transgender students, ACLU argues _ MLive
The Board of Education for the Highland Local School District (“Highland”) filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, asking the court to reverse a lower court’s decision in it’s lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education. The brief also asks the court to deny a motion for preliminary injunction from third-party plaintiff Jane Doe, a male student in the Highland Local School District seeking access to sex-segregated facilities reserved for female students.
On September 26, 2016 U.S. District Court Judge Algenon L. Marbley granted a preliminary injunction to Jane Doe stating, “The Court orders School District officials to treat Jane Doe as the girl she is, including referring to her by female pronouns and her female name and allowing her to use the girls’ restroom at Highland Elementary School.”
In its brief filed April 19, Highland asserts, “This appeal concerns the efforts of Appellants to ensure a safe and secure learning environment for Intervenor Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee Jane Doe, a minor, by and through her legal guardians Joyce and John Doe (“Doe”), as well as all the other students enrolled in Highland, and the competing efforts of Doe and other parties to improperly expand both Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause to encompass the concept of gender identity in violation of the plain language of the statute, congressional intent, and existing federal case law.” [emphasis added]
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 in favor of Gavin Grimm, 16, a female teen who identifies as a transgender boy. Grimm is suing Virginia’s Gloucester County School Board, arguing that its policy requiring students to use sex-segregated spaces based on their sex (or “gender-neutral” single-person facilities) is a violation of Title IX of the US Education Amendments of 1972. Title IX bans discrimination based on sex at schools that receive federal funding. Continue reading