2 thoughts on “Campbell v. Smith (USA)”

  1. “An Information charged Campbell with first-degree sexual assault of a child, incest, exposing a child to harmful material, and causing a child to view or listen to sexual activity. The charges stemmed from allegations that Campbell sexually assaulted his ten-year-old daughter.”

    He needs to rot in prison, and NEVER be granted access to women’s restrooms, locker rooms, etc. He should never be around children. EVER.

    Because of the way most “gender identity” laws are written, this convicted sex offender could claim “gender identity disorder” and be granted access to women’s restrooms, locker rooms, etc. What mother wants this man in the same restroom as her daughter. He is NOT the first sex offender to claim “gender identity”. There is a long list of these guys. This man probably will get out of prison one day.

    Don’t be surprised if he doesn’t sue the state he is incarcerated in for female hormones and surgery while he sits in jail for raping a child. (wife killer Robert, “Michelle” Kosilek, Kenneth Hunt, Sandy Jo Battista (sexual predator), Synthia China Blast (Luis Morales), Richard, “Sherri”, Masbruch, Ronny Darnell). This is a small sample….

  2. “Campbell had been diagnosed with “a personality disorder, gender identity disorder” and argued that he had “some very serious sexuality issues, very serious boundary issues.” Id. at 22.”

    So, it’s possible for males to have serious sexuality and boundary issues and a personality disorder, and have “gender identity disorder” at the same time. Sexually assaulting his own ten year old daughter is sick and revolting. He needs to rot in hell. Can I say that on this blog, or will it be deleted?

    I’m just waiting for him to claim “gender identity” to get tax payer funded female hormones and maybe some laser hair removal, etc.

Comments are closed.